Another difference between a classic and neural-democracy is what we call an Embedded Position. The classic version poses a question, “Should we build this house?” and the “yes” or “no” answer is binary. On the other hand, a neural-democracy can additionally resolve the “fuzzy” point on a scale of the house’s cost. For example, instead of asking “Should we build this house?” we could ask, “How much should we spend on this house?” One’s binary position is embedded in the amount of funding they choose, $0 embedded as “no,” and effectively, any other reasonable amount, “yes.” As people weigh in, and the Frame Effect is met with sufficient “yes” votes, the issue not only becomes a law, but that fuzzy question of expense is simultaneously resolved into a mathematical mean, representing the Body’s desire as a whole to fund the house.

First, read our philosophy to better understand our Creed.